Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning‐Based Ionosphere and Space Weather Forecasting: Ensemble, Bayesian Neural Network, and Quantile Gradient Boosting

Randa Natraš, Benedikt S. Soja, Michael F. Schmidt

Space Weather 2023 article cited by 17

importance 4/10 ai assisted Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics space weather stage: research

ML-based ionosphere and space weather forecasts lacked uncertainty quantification, so the confidence and reliability of their results were unknown.

Without uncertainty estimates, users cannot know how confident and reliable ML forecast results are.

Implemented and compared four uncertainty quantification approaches (super-ensemble, quantile gradient boosting, Bayesian neural network, BNN with data uncertainty) for 1-day-ahead VTEC forecasting with 95% confidence intervals.

1-day-ahead VTEC forecasts with 95% CIs; techniques considering only model parameter uncertainties (super-ensemble, BNN) predicted narrow CIs and over-optimistic results

The evidence supports a comparative finding on which uncertainty methods yield reliable confidence estimates for ML space-weather forecasts.

Venue Space Weather
Published 2023
Work type article
Authors Randa Natraš, Benedikt S. Soja, Michael F. Schmidt
Citations 17 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 55
Model or method Bayesian neural networks, quantile gradient boosting, super-ensemble of ML models
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003483
Open access gold
Keywords space weather, ionosphere, VTEC, uncertainty quantification, Bayesian neural networks
4 / 10

real but narrower advance

Uncertainty quantification for ML ionosphere/space-weather forecasts is a real but narrow methodological advance; abstract gives no scale of affected users or systems.

Basis: inferred. Judged from the source text, which gives no explicit scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7