PHOTOMETRIC SUPERNOVA CLASSIFICATION WITH MACHINE LEARNING

Michelle Lochner, Jason D. McEwen, Hiranya V. Peiris, O. Lahav, Max Kerr Winter

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 2016 article cited by 195

importance 6/10 ai assisted Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae astronomical surveys stage: research

Upcoming imaging surveys will discover too many supernovae for spectroscopic type confirmation, so automated photometric classification is needed.

Supernova typing at survey scale is needed for cosmology programs like DES and LSST.

Built a two-stage pipeline: extracting features from light curves (SALT2 fits, parametric models, wavelets) then classifying with machine learning algorithms.

not stated in source

Provides a classification pipeline aimed at current and upcoming supernova surveys.

Venue The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published 2016
Work type article
Authors Michelle Lochner, Jason D. McEwen, Hiranya V. Peiris, O. Lahav, Max Kerr Winter
Citations 195 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 81
Model or method naive Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, SVM, artificial neural networks, boosted decision trees
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/31
Open access bronze
Keywords supernova classification, machine learning, photometry, light curves, DES
6 / 10

significant — thousands to millions affected

Abstract states spectroscopic confirmation of all supernovae in surveys like DES and LSST will be impossible; automated classification enables survey-scale cosmology, a foundational field.

Basis: stated. The source itself states the scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7