Identifying Exoplanets with Deep Learning: A Five-planet Resonant Chain around Kepler-80 and an Eighth Planet around Kepler-90

Christopher J. Shallue, Andrew M. Vanderburg

The Astronomical Journal 2018 article cited by 368

importance 4/10 solved Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies exoplanet science stage: research

Weak Kepler signals at low signal-to-noise are hard to distinguish from false positives, blocking accurate occurrence rates of Earth-sized planets.

Determining how common Earth-sized planets are requires reliably vetting faint candidate signals.

A deep convolutional neural network was trained to classify signals as transiting exoplanets or false positives and rank candidates by planet likelihood.

Ranked plausible planet signals above false positives 98.8% of the time on test set; per title, identified a five-planet resonant chain around Kepler-80 and an eighth planet around Kepler-90.

Enabled automated vetting of weak candidates and discovery of new multi-planet systems around Kepler-80 and Kepler-90.

Venue The Astronomical Journal
Published 2018
Work type article
Authors Christopher J. Shallue, Andrew M. Vanderburg
Citations 368 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 96
Model or method deep convolutional neural network
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa9e09
Open access hybrid
Keywords deep learning, exoplanets, Kepler, false positives, convolutional neural network
4 / 10

real but narrower advance

Abstract states determining occurrence rates of Earth-sized planets requires reliable vetting at low signal-to-noise; significant for exoplanet science but a narrow research domain.

Basis: stated. The source itself states the scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7