Deep learning-based survival prediction for multiple cancer types using histopathology images

Ellery Wulczyn, David F. Steiner, Zhaoyang Xu, Apaar Sadhwani, Hongwu Wang, Isabelle Flament-Auvigne, Craig H. Mermel, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen et al.

PLoS ONE 2020 article cited by 265

importance 7/10 ai assisted AI in cancer detection oncology stage: research

Predicting disease-specific survival risk for cancer patients at diagnosis from histopathology images, where existing staging and clinical variables leave room for better risk stratification.

Prognostic information at diagnosis has important implications for treatment and monitoring decisions.

A weakly-supervised deep learning system predicted disease-specific survival across 10 TCGA cancer types from histopathology slides without pixel-level annotations, testing three survival loss functions.

Hazard ratio 1.58 (95% CI 1.28-1.70, p<0.0001) for disease-specific survival in the combined 10-cancer cohort after adjusting for cancer type, stage, age, and sex; developed on 9,086 slides from 3,664 cases, evaluated on 3,009 slides from 1,216 cases.

Peer-reviewed DLS significantly associated with survival beyond standard clinical variables across 10 cancer types.

Venue PLoS ONE
Published 2020
Work type article
Authors Ellery Wulczyn, David F. Steiner, Zhaoyang Xu, Apaar Sadhwani, Hongwu Wang, Isabelle Flament-Auvigne, Craig H. Mermel, Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen et al.
Citations 265 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 37
Model or method weakly-supervised deep learning system; specific architecture not stated in source
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233678
Open access gold
Keywords survival prediction, histopathology, deep learning, TCGA, weak supervision, Cox regression
7 / 10

significant — thousands to millions affected

Prognostic risk stratification across 10 cancer types beyond staging; treatment/monitoring implications stated, but no population scale given.

Basis: inferred. Judged from the source text, which gives no explicit scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Multimodal deep learning of fundus abnormalities and traditional risk factors for cardiovascular risk prediction
Yeong Chan Lee, Jiho Cha, Injeong Shim, Woong‐Yang Park, Se Woong Kang...
2023 107
10
2 Reliable Tuberculosis Detection Using Chest X-Ray With Deep Learning, Segmentation and Visualization
Tawsifur Rahman, Amith Abdullah Khandakar, Muhammad Abdul Kadir, Khand...
2020 651
10
3 A comparative analysis of machine learning classifiers for stroke prediction: A predictive analytics approach
Nitish Biswas, Khandaker Mohammad Mohi Uddin, Sarreha Tasmin Rikta, Sa...
2022 116
10
4 Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis from DXA Scan and Retinal Images Using Deep Learning
Hamada R. H. Al-Absi, Mohammad Tariqul Islam, Mahmoud Ahmed Refaee, Mu...
2022 89
10
5 Proteomics and Machine Learning Approaches Reveal a Set of Prognostic Markers for COVID-19 Severity With Drug Repurposing Potential
Kruthi Suvarna, Deeptarup Biswas, Medha Gayathri J. Pai, Arup Acharjee...
2021 76
10