A Machine Learning Classifier for Fast Radio Burst Detection at the VLBA

Kiri L. Wagstaff, Benyang Tang, David R. Thompson, Shakeh Khudikyan, Jane Wyngaard, Adam T. Deller, Divya Palaniswamy, Steven John Tingay et al.

Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2016 article cited by 44

importance 4/10 ai assisted Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology radio astronomy stage: deployed

Fast transient searches like V-FASTR on the Very Long Baseline Array produce huge numbers of candidate detections that burden astronomers with manual review time.

Human review time limits how quickly rare cosmic events like fast radio bursts can be identified in large data streams.

A trained machine learning classifier labels each candidate as a known pulsar pulse, radio frequency interference artifact, or potential new discovery, restricting predictions to those with at least 90% confidence.

Time spent reviewing decreased and the fraction of interesting candidates increased; classifier only predicts at ≥90% confidence (no numeric metrics stated)

The deployed classifier reduced human review burden and improved candidate yield in the V-FASTR system.

Venue Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Published 2016
Work type article
Authors Kiri L. Wagstaff, Benyang Tang, David R. Thompson, Shakeh Khudikyan, Jane Wyngaard, Adam T. Deller, Divya Palaniswamy, Steven John Tingay et al.
Citations 44 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 27
Model or method machine learning classifier (type not stated in source)
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/128/966/084503
Open access bronze
Keywords machine learning, fast radio bursts, VLBA, candidate classification, V-FASTR
4 / 10

real but narrower advance

Abstract states candidate detections are a significant human reviewing burden in V-FASTR transient searches; a deployed classifier filters 80-90% of candidates, easing discovery of rare events in one astronomy system.

Basis: stated. The source itself states the scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7