q2-sample-classifier: machine-learning tools for microbiome classification and regression

Nicholas A. Bokulich, Matthew R. Dillon, Evan K Bolyen, Benjamin D. Kaehler, Gavin A. Huttley, J. Gregory Caporaso

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2018 preprint cited by 32

importance 4/10 ai assisted Gut microbiota and health microbiome bioinformatics stage: research open-source model

Microbiome researchers need to predict outcomes or differentiate samples from microbial composition, but supervised learning methods were not easily accessible or systematically benchmarked.

Linking microbial composition to health outcomes supports research and clinical decision-making.

The q2-sample-classifier plugin brings scikit-learn supervised classifiers and regressors into the QIIME 2 framework, with automated feature selection and hyperparameter tuning, and benchmarks them on microbiome data.

Random forest, extra trees, and gradient boosting showed highest performance; automated feature selection and tuning enhanced most methods (no numeric metrics stated)

Makes machine-learning tools more accessible and interpretable to microbiologists, clinicians, and other researchers.

Venue bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published 2018
Work type preprint
Authors Nicholas A. Bokulich, Matthew R. Dillon, Evan K Bolyen, Benjamin D. Kaehler, Gavin A. Huttley, J. Gregory Caporaso
Citations 32 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 31
Model or method scikit-learn classifiers/regressors (random forest, extra trees, gradient boosting)
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1101/306167
Open access green
Keywords microbiome, machine learning, supervised classification, QIIME 2, benchmarking
4 / 10

real but narrower advance

Abstract frames the problem as accessibility of supervised learning for microbiome prediction tasks; the plugin aids research and clinical decision-making but is a tooling/benchmarking advance of narrow stated scope.

Basis: inferred. Judged from the source text, which gives no explicit scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models
Mihály Váradi, Stephen Anyango, Mandar Deshpande, Sreenath Sasidharan...
2021 7,782
9
2 Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model
Zeming Lin, Halil Akin, Roshan Rao, Brian Hie, Zhongkai Zhu, Wenting L...
2023 5,455
9
3 Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network
Minkyung Baek, Frank DiMaio, Ivan V. Anishchenko, Justas Dauparas, Ser...
2021 5,468
9
4 De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Joseph L. Watson, David Juergens, Nathaniel R. Bennett, Brian L. Tripp...
2023 2,294
9
5 Structure Prediction and Computational Protein Design for Efficient Biocatalysts and Bioactive Proteins
Rebecca Buller, Jiřı́ Damborský, Donald Hilvert, Uwe T. Bornscheuer
2024 40
9