Explaining deep learning of galaxy morphology with saliency mapping

Prabh Bhambra, Benjamin Joachimi, O. Lahav

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022 article cited by 28

importance 3/10 solved Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) astronomy stage: research

Measuring galactic bar lengths at scale requires automation beyond human visual classification of galaxy morphology.

Automated measurement enables analysis of large astronomical data sets beyond what human classification can cover.

CNNs trained on Galaxy Zoo human classifications predict galaxy morphology, and SmoothGrad saliency mapping extracts the bar, which a bespoke algorithm then measures; contrasted with a CNN directly predicting bar lengths.

Correlation with human measurements of 0.76 (XAI method) vs 0.59 (direct CNN); RMSE 1.69 vs 2.10; XAI outperformed conventional deep learning.

XAI approach outperformed conventional deep learning for bar measurement and is suggested to extend to other galactic features such as bulge-to-disc ratio.

Venue Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published 2022
Work type article
Authors Prabh Bhambra, Benjamin Joachimi, O. Lahav
Citations 28 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 37
Model or method convolutional neural networks with SmoothGrad saliency mapping
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac368
Open access hybrid
Keywords galaxy morphology, explainable AI, saliency mapping, CNN, Galaxy Zoo, bar length
3 / 10

incremental / niche

Automating galactic bar length measurement extends analysis of large astronomy datasets beyond human classification; a niche research task with no stated scale beyond astronomy data processing.

Basis: inferred. Judged from the source text, which gives no explicit scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7