Comparison of neural network and support vector machine methods for Kp forecasting

Eun‐Young Ji, Yong‐Jae Moon, Jongyeob Park, Jin‐Yi Lee, Dong‐Hun Lee

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics 2013 article cited by 45

importance 4/10 partially solved Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics space weather stage: research

Near-real-time forecasting of the Kp geomagnetic activity index was addressed by comparing four forecast models based on neural networks and support vector machines using solar wind data and preliminary Kp values.

Kp indexes geomagnetic activity and accurate forecasts are needed for space-weather monitoring; broader stakes are not stated in source.

Neural network and support vector machine models were built and compared for Kp forecasting; the neural network using solar wind data plus preliminary Kp values performed best.

Best model (NN with solar wind and preliminary Kp): correlation coefficient 0.93, RMS error 0.48, mean absolute error 0.61.

Peer-reviewed comparison showing the neural network model outperformed the other three tested models.

Venue Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published 2013
Work type article
Authors Eun‐Young Ji, Yong‐Jae Moon, Jongyeob Park, Jin‐Yi Lee, Dong‐Hun Lee
Citations 45 (OpenAlex, at import time)
References 35
Model or method neural network and support vector machine
Organization not stated in source
Primary source https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50500
Open access bronze
Keywords Kp index, geomagnetic activity, neural network, support vector machine, space weather, forecasting
4 / 10

real but narrower advance

Kp forecasting supports space-weather monitoring; abstract presents a model comparison without stating affected populations, infrastructure, or economic scale.

Basis: inferred. Judged from the source text, which gives no explicit scale. Stated scale: not stated in source. Method and limits.

# Paper Year Citations Importance
1 Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning
Jonas Degrave, Federico Felici, Jonas Buchli, Michael Neunert, Brendan...
2022 739
7
2 Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks
Giuseppe Carleo, Matthias Troyer
2017 2,205
7
3 Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors
Johannes Bausch, Andrew Senior, Francisco J. H. Heras, Thomas Edlich,...
2024 90
7
4 Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning
Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, Nicolas Delfosse, Vedran Dunjko, Hans J. Brie...
2019 158
7
5 Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code
Paul Baireuther, Thomas E. O’Brien, Brian Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakk...
2018 141
7