A Machine Learning Classifier for Fast Radio Burst Detection at the VLBA
Problem
Fast transient searches like V-FASTR on the Very Long Baseline Array produce huge numbers of candidate detections that burden astronomers with manual review time.
Why it matters
Human review time limits how quickly rare cosmic events like fast radio bursts can be identified in large data streams.
What the AI did
A trained machine learning classifier labels each candidate as a known pulsar pulse, radio frequency interference artifact, or potential new discovery, restricting predictions to those with at least 90% confidence.
Results
Time spent reviewing decreased and the fraction of interesting candidates increased; classifier only predicts at ≥90% confidence (no numeric metrics stated)
Impact
The deployed classifier reduced human review burden and improved candidate yield in the V-FASTR system.
Record
| Venue | Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific |
|---|---|
| Published | 2016 |
| Work type | article |
| Authors | Kiri L. Wagstaff, Benyang Tang, David R. Thompson, Shakeh Khudikyan, Jane Wyngaard, Adam T. Deller, Divya Palaniswamy, Steven John Tingay et al. |
| Citations | 44 (OpenAlex, at import time) |
| References | 27 |
| Model or method | machine learning classifier (type not stated in source) |
| Organization | not stated in source |
| Primary source | https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/128/966/084503 |
| Open access | bronze |
| Keywords | machine learning, fast radio bursts, VLBA, candidate classification, V-FASTR |
Importance rating
real but narrower advance
Abstract states candidate detections are a significant human reviewing burden in V-FASTR transient searches; a deployed classifier filters 80-90% of candidates, easing discovery of rare events in one astronomy system.
More in Physics & Astronomy
| # | Paper | Year | Citations | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnetic control of tokamak plasmas through deep reinforcement learning | 2022 | 739 |
7
|
| 2 | Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks | 2017 | 2,205 |
7
|
| 3 | Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors | 2024 | 90 |
7
|
| 4 | Optimizing Quantum Error Correction Codes with Reinforcement Learning | 2019 | 158 |
7
|
| 5 | Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code | 2018 | 141 |
7
|